President Barack Obama has done more in support of gay
rights than any previous US President.
He presided over repeal of the Don’t
Ask Don’t Tell law thus enabling gay soldiers to serve openly in the US
military. His administration has
determined that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional and taken that
position in pending court cases. Yet the
President has not come out in support of same sex marriage.
Politically speaking, the most important issue for the cause
of gay rights in the US is whether or not President Obama wins re-election. His Republican opponent in the Presidential
contest supports an amendment to the US Constitution which would ban same sex marriage. It is far more important for
the cause of gay rights that Obama be re-elected than whether he comes out in
favor of same sex marriage before the election.
That said, the wise political choice for the President is
the same as the correct ethical and moral choice – to support marriage equality
for same sex couples. Some of his
closest associates have already done so.
Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, delivered a forceful and
eloquent address to the UN Commission on Human Rights that gay rights are human
rights. Recently Vice President Biden
came out in support of same sex marriage during an interview on Meet the Press
recalling what he told a gay couple, I
wish every American could see the look of love those kids had in their eyes for
you guys, and they wouldn't have any doubt about what this is about. Shaun
Donovan, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Arne
Duncan, Secretary of Education, have also came out in support of marriage
equality. One can be sure that the press
will now ask every prominent member of the administration about their position
on this issue. The Democrats may well
make marriage equality a plank in their platform.
President Obama previously in his political career has supported
marriage equality. Why is he refusing to
take a position on this issue now? The
political calculus may be that he believes that he needs the support of African
American churches to get their parishioners to vote in the Presidential election. Many of the preachers in these churches oppose
gay rights. In fact, passage of
Proposition 8 in California in 2008 banning same sex marriage has been ascribed
in part to the increased turnout of African Americans who came out to vote for
Barack Obama for President but then also voted in support of Proposition 8.
However, I think the above political calculation is wrong. Support for marriage equality is now a
majority view in the United States.
President Obama coming out for marriage equality would provide him with
an energized base of gay Americans, their friends and families, and proponents
of civil rights. Members of this
community would vote for President Obama in any case, but some may hold back
from active involvement in the campaign while President Obama holds back on
this issue. Opponents of Barack Obama
are already energized and will oppose him regardless of whether or not he comes
out openly to support marriage equality.
President Obama has the opportunity to take the lead on the
preeminent civil rights issue of our day – which befits his status as the first
US President of African ancestry. To
fail to do so makes him look like he is just politically triangulating on this
issue. Obama needs to contrast himself
with Mitt Romney whose labile etch-a-sketch political views are revised with every
change in the political winds.
If President Obama can present himself as the candidate who courageously
supports causes because they are right and just, and not because of a political
calculus, he will distinguish himself from his opponent. This politically and ethically wise path will
garner the President the energy of his supporters that enabled him to get
elected in 2008. Their support has now
gone limp and requires some political boldness to get revitalized. The best political strategy may be the politics-be-damned strategy.
The majority of Americans have already evolved on the topic of marriage
equality, it is time for the President to do so too and belatedly take a leadership role on
this issue.
New York state residents have been able to to} place sports bets online since January, with the state charging an eye-popping $25 million to operators for a license. In California, two initiatives concerning online gambling rules are set to be the most costly ballot campaign in U.S. history. The measures would make sports betting in the state legal both in individual and online. An online affiliate's purpose is to get people to click on on their links. 우리카지노 To deliver the best results, casino options ought to be thoroughly conversant in their target market.
ReplyDelete